![]() ![]() The one heuristicĬall me a pessimist, but we need to stop the wishful thinking. In terms of success, the last 1000 hours of swimming training might have much larger payoffs in terms of success than the first 9000. This is the reasoning behind Malcolm Gladwell’s 10,000 hour rule. You’ll only get the benefit from swimming if you stick with it for a really long time. But if you’re trying to get a career in swimming, that doesn’t mean anything unless you win the Olympics. If you start learning to swim, you might feel 10x better after the first 10 hours of training. The consequence is that when we do less, we have more resources, time and energy left over to invest in the really important stuff.Īnd when we force ourselves to only say yes to opportunities that are really really good, we get better returns from our investment.Ī common fallacy is to think that an investment of time in something gives you diminishing returns the more time you devote to it. We have limited resources, time, and energy. If the answer is yes, then it can’t be a bad decision … Absolutely, I believe that as a default ‘yes’ is better than ‘no’. ![]() I ask myself: ‘Will doing x create opportunity for me?’. This is what he calls the most important heuristic to deciding whether to say yes: Where Fraser goes wrong is when he starts giving advice. Remember the donkey? Saying yes to everything can metaphorically kill you inside. But how do you know what things to say yes to? We all have limited time and energy we physically can’t do everything. Knowing when to say yes and when to say no is, in my opinion, one of the most important skills in life. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |